Although I’m not exercising it well enough at this time, I believe… self discipline is a much more likely means for [and predictor of] success than IQ ever will be.
Note To Self: Start Planning & Measuring More!
Posted by frek on October 27, 2011
Although I’m not exercising it well enough at this time, I believe… self discipline is a much more likely means for [and predictor of] success than IQ ever will be.
Note To Self: Start Planning & Measuring More!
Posted in work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on March 19, 2011
IBG YBG or the “I Be Gone, You Be Gone” business strategy … is rotten and solely removes value on every level. Look where this ‘Wall Street’ driven disease got the world.
Shame on these ‘holier than now’ college institutions for essentially selling entitlement to its’ students.
Shame on Wall Street for being entitled and for removing value, rather than ever adding it.
And shame on the media for failing to see it and to report it without bias; for making heroes of ‘bullshit artist thieves’.
Saw my share of it in the early internet days as an employee; see it plenty now with each new gimmick coming down the pike. Very few people want to serve clients these days. Sure some clients can be exhausting, but none of us are entitled to anything … other than to earn our pay! Earn it by adding value!
What adds value for clients who make money every day? Give something that actually supports them in the scope of their work environment .
I recently rejected something in business that struck me as more of the same – IBG YBG. Folks wanted to merge my business into theirs, all the while their view of the world was IBG YBG.
I’m into delivering value and sustaining long term business relationships… it’s what my firm does and will continue to do!
Posted in work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on September 9, 2006
I was reflecting about my dad and how he operated.
I remember one day a girl scout knocked on our door in NJ and my mother got up from her seat in the living room and answered it. The girl was selling cookies and my mom said something to the tune of “come back and I’ll buy your cookies.” My old man, who was reading (…always reading) somewhere in earshot, gave her a hard time for it.
My mom was kind and had she had any cash on her person at that moment she would have given it all, but she didn’t and probably wasn’t planning on running out to the ATM either. Kind was and has always been her nature and I love her very much for it; however, my dad’s point, which may not seem so kind was ”you don’t ever say what you may not live up too”…or more specifically “don’t be be full of it.”
My dad always felt life was hard enough, but you could make it a little easier by just being straight with people (he also didn’t think fibbing was nice or kind.) I don’t believe the girl scout ever came back around, but I’m sure it was a little uncomfortable there awhile for my mom wondering if she would
Posted in lessons learned, sales, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on July 20, 2006
August 02, 2005
RSS/ Content Syndication: ‘The Killer App’
‘The Killer App’ is not the Blog so much as it is the rapid develop and deploy capabilities of it and any content (personal journals, news, promotions, calendars of events and more) created by anyone in a syndicating format such as RSS.
The story here is how, because of RSS, traditional sources of content could easily become disintermediated. Coverage has focused on the Blogging phenomena mostly because there are so many Bloggers on the web, but there’s a deeper evolving story here and it is the content itself.
It’s about the freedom of content and how syndicating content formats (RSS, Atom, etc.) offer the individual consumer customization and/ or choice of information. Direct. With the average ‘newsreader’ or ‘feed aggregator’ application a person can actually identify and connect direct to any source of content created in a syndicating format. They can develop their own direct & continuous flow of timely, personally relevant & secure information from the sources they value. They can eliminate the noise!
Simply put, the complete customization of incoming information for all people is now possible. To traditional media, readership is at stake: once informed of the choices the readers may no longer want the entire newspaper, opting instead for a customizable ‘newsreader.’ To the average journalist or thought leader it’s the chance to go direct to her audience. For the enterprise, it’s a different opportunity for getting the promotional message out, but one that requires careful consideration. It means there’s a 2nd chance to reach the people actually interested in their products, services & expertise.
Relationship customers & constituents no longer need to search repetitively in order to be informed, to concern themselves with ‘artificial personalization’ deployed by intrusive cookies & spy ware and they will no longer accept abusive email practices. It means that if the enterprise can offer useful content information, can respect a person’s right to privacy and can respect a person’s right to control the exchange, they can build direct, loyal & informed relationships.
Posted in blogs, companies, web 2.0, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on July 6, 2006
Posted in blogs, companies, lessons learned, web 2.0, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on July 4, 2006
My third and final post in three on Sales. In my (humble) opinion, Sales Management’s primary focus should be on how to repeatedly deliver client value. How it’s handled, with many other challenges, will determine whether or not clients buy and return to buy again.
Understanding that prospective clients perceive value in many different ways, a company’s business plan is often typically challenged by the marketplace. Because the Sales Operation fields various off- plan demands from its prospect pipeline and because it is required to produce new business revenue it has the potential to become an incredibly disruptive force. Managing Sales People, trying to stick to a business plan, meeting revenue projections AND repeatedly delivering client value are only a few of the challenging responsibilities at hand.
Fundamental skills (IE nos. forecasting, motivation, prospect pipeline, etc.) a given, Sales Management must ultimately lead by supporting their people’s ability to close deals. Repeatedly closing a gap between a planned ‘value proposition’ and the client’s perception of value is a real- world challenge requiring real- world experience. Experienced Sales People work to close that gap by listening and by strategically advocating for the client, but will also minimize internal disruption by qualifying their new business opportunities (before dedicating company resources) carefully. They can accept the responsibility of new business production while managing the least disruption to resources possible, but in return expect Sales Management to support their efforts.
Often many forces exist to defend various agendas (IE Business Plan, Engineering/ Programming execution, Investor Equity, Egos, etc., etc.), meaning a Company’s resources aren’t necessarily dedicated to the sole purpose of providing clients with value. Sales Management must be able to interpret this and to leverage information gathered in the field in order to determine where and/or where not to challenge a plan. She must be prepared to fight (the balance of) management for change, for resources and for more Sales support in order to succeed.
The demands, both internal & external, make for a challenging environment, but at the end of the day all agendas rely on successful selling. Experienced Sales Management knows success ultimately depends upon the repeated delivery of client value.
Posted in companies, sales, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on June 27, 2006
Good Sales People can sell virtually any ‘value proposition’ and while they’re motivated by commissions it’s never at the expense of personal integrity. A Sales Person’s contacts are typically a result of the value they willingly add and, while invaluable, are only a small piece of the much larger scope of responsibility.
Training & experience can never be discounted, but the most productive Sales People are crackerjack prospectors, accomplished strategic thinkers, focused listeners, willing teachers, tactful in follow through and, for client, a ‘value added resource.’
Prospecting requires discipline for a nos. game the average person will not play. Experienced Sales People identify their target market, develop a plan for engagement (IE Contact 100 prospects, communicate with 50, propose to 15 and close 5 per month) and, despite massive doses of rejection, pursue their plan with a sense of urgency! ‘Sense of urgency’, by the way, is never at the expense of tactful follow through nor should it ever be a prospective client’s burden.
Product knowledge & preparation are a given, but experienced Sales People also speak less and listen more. They inherently know conversations are driven by questions and good questions lead to more meaningful answers. They possess a keen interest for what businesses do, for what they need in order to do it better AND for how to leverage a ‘value proposition’ accordingly. By listening, the answers to how are often discovered. Strategic thinking doesn’t suggest one become an expert on a prospect’s business (IE every aspect of a Co. like IBM) when the goal is to repeatedly sell through. In terms of a discipline IBM is only one…or maybe a couple sales, but hopefully the point of ‘a nos. game’ as a priority resonates here.
In summary Experienced Sales People are a great deal more then producers of new business: they develop a prospect pipeline, they create good will in the marketplace, they are long term relationship makers and they are the gatherers of invaluable field intelligence for their employers. Without these core Sales Competencies, it is unlikely said Co. can operate at its maximum potential. Without them, “good luck.”
Next Post: Sales Management
Posted in companies, sales, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on June 21, 2006
Forgive me in advance, but I’m going to jump on my Sales pedestal for a few posts including a take on Sales, Sales People and Sales Management.
For Companies selling to other Companies, repeatedly producing Sales requires a heckuva’ lot more effort than simply showing up and, in an ever more time- challenged business environment, invitations are unlikely. Additionally and especially in the land of the startup, I’ll go out on a limb and say management is typically heavy on product knowledge, projections and plan but light on core Sales Competencies.
Sales is a process and it requires a repeated closing of the gap between ‘value proposition’ and where value is perceived on the part of prospective clients. In that gap lay any number of unpredictable circumstances (IE knowledge- base, existing relationships, pre- conceived notions, competition, available time, budget, etc., etc.) making Sales virtually unpredictable AND the most misunderstood discipline in business. It’s been my experience across multiple start-up companies that management often feels their product/service is so unique prospective clients will “trip over themselves” to buy. Passion is perfectly acceptable, but unfortunately nothing could be further from the truth.
Recent history shows that in order to be successful in a hyper- competitive world companies selling to other companies need to combat these unpredictable variables with an experienced & disciplined Sales effort. Because Sales is so misunderstood there is rarely investment in training making the need to employ either experienced individuals OR to mentor & manage undeniable. Good Sales People will -despite less than optimal personal treatment, imminent rejection and vast exposure to support systems (who may have little in the way of personal accountability to a client)- repeatedly fight to close the gap between proposed & perceived value based upon their rare nature. If managed well, those same people will create good will, long term relationships and they will gather invaluable strategic intelligence from the marketplace.
Without these core Sales Competencies, it is unlikely said Co. can operate at its maximum potential. Without them, “good luck.”
Next Post: Sales People
Posted in companies, sales, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on June 7, 2006
Bill French, MyST Technology Partners, is an insightful guy with a rare combination of business acumen, 'top of the heap' Information Architecture skill & programming experience. He’s a thought leader on how Web 2.0, Blogs, RSS and syndicating' content formats will and do apply to the Enterprise. It's relevant to mention, MyST provides Intel, Verisign, Borland and many other brand name Technology Cos. with their Web 2.0 Architecture. I believe there are Cos. stepping forward with some reliable 'Blog Feed Subscription Tracking' solutions and I had a discussion with Bill on the subject, as follows:
Q: "Correct me if I’m wrong, but it may be awhile before Blog Feed Subscription tracking can be perfected for the Blogger or Enterprise Blogger?"
BF: "The web (really, the HTTP protocol) was never designed to be measured. Web 2.0 tosses a new curve ball to that reality. It may be a very long while.
"
Q: "I was speaking with a prominent Web 2.0 Executive and he expressed pride in their world class caching* techniques. It wasn’t relevant to the conversation at hand, but I thought to myself, 'it’s where accurate feed tracking breaks down.' If the Feed or Newsreader Co. caches, they’re undermining the Content Management Software or Blog Software Cos. ability to track Blog Feed Subscriptions accurately for their Bloggers."
BF: "Caching*-forward content has been around along time – Akamai perfected the model in the late 90’s, and it now happens in almost every application. It’s necessary for many reasons (performance is a big one), and it will not likely end."
Q: "So if they grab & cache a Blog Post or Feed once and then redistribute to many, can there be an accurate tracking path between Blog & individual?"
BF: "Bloglines, MyYahoo, and pretty much everyone does this. Everything about syndication undermines tracking. If you have 300 unique IP addresses requesting a feed, that doesn’t mean you have 300 subscribers. One IP address could represent a proxy server for 70,000 people inside a firewall. Or One IP address could be a NewsGator server with 3500 subscribers behind it. Furthermore, One subscriber might have 30 different IP addresses in a single day. So all measures (that we’ve come to know for Web 1.0) are pretty much useless."
Q: "That said, is it sensible for the Blogger to offer a ‘summary only’ feed whereby, at least, they can track the page views of those that click into their Blog website in order to review the entire post?"
BF: "This is an often-debated point, and (in my view) it should be decided based on the content consumer’s requirements, not the producer’s requirements."
Q: "Tracking of ‘subscriber to Blog’ connections and therefore 'Return on Investment' metrics for a sponsor may not ever be a completely accurate science."
BF: "Correct."
* Cache- In computer science, a cache (pronounced kăsh) is a collection of data duplicating original values stored elsewhere or computed earlier, where the original data is expensive (usually in terms of access time) to fetch or compute relative to reading the cache. Once the data is stored in the cache, future use can be made by accessing the cached copy rather than refetching or recomputing the original data, so that the average access time is lower.
Posted in blogs, companies, friends, web 2.0, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on May 13, 2006
The goal of accountability is at times in tension with the goal of leadership. A constituency may have short-term desires which are at odds with long-term interests.
Accountability is a concept in ethics with several meanings. It is often used synonymously with such concepts as answerability, responsibility, blameworthiness, liability and other terms associated with the expectation of account-giving. As an aspect of governance, it has been central to discussions related to problems in both the public and private (corporation) worlds.
At its root, accountability involves either the expectation or assumption of account-giving behavior. The study of account giving as a sociological act was first explicitly articulated in a 1968 article on “Accounts” by Marvin Scott and Stanford Lyman, [1] although it can be traced as well to J.L. Austin‘s 1956 essay “A Plea for Excuses,” [2] in which he used excuse-making as an example of speech acts. Communications scholars have extended this work through the examination of strategic uses of excuses, justifications, rationalizations, apologies and other forms of account giving behavior by individuals and corporations, and Philip Tetlock and his colleagues have applied experimental design techniques to explore how individuals behave under various scenarios and situations that demand accountability.
In politics, and particularly in representative democracies, accountability is an important factor in securing good governance. Accountability differs from transparency in that it only enables negative feedback after a decision or action, while transparency also enables negative feedback before or during a decision or action. Accountability constrains the extent to which elected representatives and other office-holders can willfully deviate from their theoretical responsibilities, thus reducing corruption.
Posted in companies, friends, lessons learned, sales, work | 1 Comment »
Posted by frek on March 22, 2006
Funny. Because of work, how much I enjoy it and feel accountable to those involved I haven't taken a moment to feel excited about going away.
That is 'til just about now. Headed toward the airport and some excitement just set in. To visit & see a part of Europe with Mel' I've never been. Lots of good friends will be there on the first leg for a wedding in Valencia. Then it's off to Barcelona and Madrid.
…..and then I'm thinking about the marketers & analysts I won't speak with for a whole week's time. Is my next trip to Manhattan planned well enough? Have to get up to San Francisco. Have I cared for existing clients enough?
Posted in friends, travel, work | Leave a Comment »
Posted by frek on January 20, 2006
forgive the rant, but in my working life i’ve been so incredibly disappointed over a consistent business world reality. cos. often typically place an emphasis on pedigree and not performance & accountability.
i’ll go way out on a limb here and suggest experience, accountability & ‘performance track record’ trumps pedigree. harvard, duke, stanford and the like aren’t necessarily the answer.
point being, focus on the latter without emphasizing the former and it will undermine your success every time.
Posted in companies, lessons learned, sales, work | Leave a Comment »